|
It's a sad indictment on the Congress of the United States, and perhaps more so on the people that elected those foul offending members, when a duly elected President is attacked and persecuted from the day he takes office, to the day he leaves office, and all evidence shows it will continue until he, his family, and supporters are "cancelled" from existence. Never before in the annals of American history has this been attempted, and maybe accomplished, until now.
It is also equally surprising this President took on that vile corrupt Government and fought them toe-to-toe for four long years, never faltering, never wavering. Never before has a President had to fight so hard - at home and abroad - to protect American interests and sovereignty while under personal attack at every turn within the Government he was elected by the people to lead. Those attacks came from within his own party and from the full force of a shameless, corrupt opposition party. A lesser man would have folded like a cheap card table under such a relentless assault. However, President Donald J. Trump did not fold and he did not crumble; he fought back. He was no ordinary man; he did not cower, nor tuck his tail and run; he prepared for battle. Finally, a man with a backbone! Save for Ronald Reagan - God bless him - this posture was rarely displayed by a conservative/Republican (certainly not in my lifetime) as it tended to infuriate the opposition. From that point, the fight was on and the conspiracy to overthrow President Trump began. In Government buildings, behind closed doors, conspirators plotted to commit seditious acts. These Government buildings, the Peoples' buildings, were occupied by corrupt politicians, lobbyists, and foreign agents who cared for nothing except themselves and their ill-gotten gains - past, present, future. My friends, within those walls, behind those closed doors, a level of treason not seen since 1780 was perpetrated on the citizens of the United States. Benedict Arnold would be proud; our nation's founding fathers would hang their heads in sorrow.
In November 2016 Donald J. Trump was elected to "drain the swamp" in Washington D.C. and root out the slimy, slithering, vile Government officials that had become so embedded: the self-serving, so-called Deep State. President Trump was on his way to exposing many of those involved and that is why he had to be removed or silenced. But President Trump was no ordinary conservative President. He would not cave in. He took the jackasses head on and by the ears; this tactic only made them bray louder. They became so vocal and rabidly hydrophobic, a new term was coined to describe the affliction: Trump Derangement Syndrome. As their screeching bellows increased, they conspired with the socialist broadcast media networks to silence him and spread false information from false sources. He called them out for what they were: 'fake news' organizations. He continued to use the only other avenue available to him - social media via smart phone, such as Twitter. Enter: 47 U.S. Code 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material. More on this later...
Although Trump Derangement Syndrome was observed mainly in the opposition party, it was also observed in "RINOs" (Republicans In Name Only), the wolves in sheep's clothing, false conservatives embedded as spies, colluding and conspiring with the opposition party to undermine President Trump. The opposition party - the Democrat party (aka Mob Rule Party) - will prove-out to be a very treacherous stain upon the pages of American history. Their rabid persecution of a sitting President, in my opinion, was seditious at best, but I lean towards a more serious definition and call it what it is: treasonous.
Most of the framework for treason had already been constructed by criminals within previous left, far-left-leaning administrations. This took many years and morphed into many forms, but it required many willing participants. Those participants, those seditious actors and posers, sought to actively infiltrate and plant their seeds of corruption and destruction. They did this by presenting Bills, making Laws, and issuing Executive Orders to remove or quell opposition under the guise of 'what's good for the country'; they did this knowing these actions were intended to circumvent the constitution, and therefore by design and intent, unconstitutional.
Perhaps as early as 1968, or perhaps 1977 with the election of Jimmy Carter (Democrat), but most certainly the framework became clear in 1990 when President George H. W. Bush (RINO) made his "New World Order" vision public knowledge; we should have known at that instant 'something was amiss' in Washington D.C.. That perceived vision continued during the administration of his son, President George W. Bush (RINO), with the pinnacle being a most egregious piece of legislation in 2001 called the U.S. Patriot Act (I will return to this). Sandwiched in the middle was President Bill Clinton, Democrat. Remember slick Willie? It is interesting to note, unbeknownst to most people, an obscure new software/firmware company - Dominion - was created circa 2000. This company would later have ties to the Clinton Foundation, Robert Mueller, and Mitch McConnell (imagine that), not to mention China and important others. It would also be prudent to investigate the actions and members of the US-China Business Council (USCBC) from 1973 to present; much can be derived from this source if one follows the money and paper trails.
The administration of President Barack Obama, elected 2008 and served two terms, avidly continued the use of the 'new world order' philosophy. The ill-gotten tools gained from previous leftist administrations allowed unbridled corruption under Barack Obama. He approved legislation and produced executive orders that would undermine our Republic and our very way of life. He was the most divisive and immoral president of my lifetime, if not of all time. It should be noted, Joe Biden was his Vice President; his policies will continue through him. Although Bill Clinton used the Office of the President mainly for his own personal gain, he embedded many bad actors, and made very bad deals with bad foreign diplomats and businessmen that harmed our national security, He was immoral, with many indiscretions to his credit.
But having said that about 'Slick Willie', no one will ever top the corruption of the Obama administration. President Barack Obama continued the appeasement-style submissive foreign policy practiced by Jimmy Carter. His policy was America as an usurper; an invader of countries, thief of lands and natural resources; a racist, bigoted nation. He did not have the best interests of America in mind. His elevation to the highest office in the land was the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the America people; or at least, so I thought. That was changed when the election was corrupted in 2020 by all the embedded socialist-minded persons put in place by high-level domestic traitors and wealthy foreign puppet-masters, hell-bent on the destruction of the United States of America. More on this later...
But, back to the Patriot Act. One of the provisions within this Act "makes it far easier for the authorities to gain access to records of citizens' activities being held by a third party. At a time when computerization is leading to the creation of more and more such records, Section 215 of the Patriot Act allows the FBI to force anyone at all - including doctors, libraries, bookstores, universities, and Internet service providers - to turn over records on their clients or customers." So, this gives great power to the Federal Government and its embedded cronies. This was allowed in Law even though it clearly violates the 4th Amendment to the Constitution:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
They used the Patriot ACT and the FISA court to 'spy' on President Trump, his administration, his family, his businesses, and acquaintances for years.
This may not seem like much to you, but let's associate this with a bit of legislation from 1996, such as 47 U.S. Code 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material. Let's focus on section 'C', article 2:
(2) Civil Liability - No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of -
(A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or
(B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).
This frees Internet-based companies such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, Instagram, MicroSoft (Bing), Twitter, and others from being charged with violating 1st Amendment rights protected by the U.S. Constitution. So, another precedent has been set where legislation is passed to circumvent the Constitution without a Constitutional Convention and amendment due process that is clearly laid out in the Articles. Once that same protection is assumed by broadcast news organizations such as ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, etc., we see a clear conspiracy to circumvent rights guaranteed by and in the Constitution of the United States. Not only that, but these co-conspirators feel empowered to promote one party while suppressing another. This is censorship at its worst and clear evidence of collusion in a conspiracy to overthrow a sitting President and interfere with an American election. They claim censorship on the basis that President Trump promotes hate through his speech, which in turn incites riots. Horse droppings! They are simply afraid of fact-based truth!
I have heard these liberal media pundits openly state that the only way for President Trump to lose re-election would be for the economy to fail and if it took that to defeat him, they would be on board. So enters COVID-19; but more on this later.
Couple these with the final hand-over of the Internet by the United States in 2016 to ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), supposedly under the auspices of the United Nations. This transfer of power was envisioned and developed in 1998 during the administration of then President Bill Clinton (Democrat).
According to the ICANN website:
"ICANN was formed in 1998. It is a not-for-profit partnership of people from all over the world dedicated to keeping the Internet secure, stable and interoperable. It promotes competition and develops policy on the Internet's unique identifiers."
"ICANN doesn't control content on the Internet. It cannot stop spam and it doesn't deal with access to the Internet. But through its coordination role of the Internet's naming system, it does have an important impact on the expansion and evolution of the Internet."
Amid fears of Internet manipulation due to the final transfer of control in 2016, ICANN responded, "ICANN is a technical organization and does not have the remit or ability to regulate content on the internet. That is true under the current contract with the US government and will remain true without the contract with the US government," (if you believe that, I bet you can find some ocean-front property in Arizona for sale cheap)!
This transfer of the Internet from the USA to ICANN was also backed by China and Russia. Another interesting note is that ICANN is based in California. If you dig deeply into the political affiliations of the board of directors, you will be astonished by their connections and whose realm of influence they are under.
It should be duly noted that Texas Senator Ted Cruz fought against this transfer of control.
These two Internet-related actions may not seem like much individually, but together, combined with the Patriot Act, as we become more and more dependent upon the Internet, rules and laws that were once clearly unconstitutional could now be circumvented with impunity. They could now be easily legislated away or ignored via executive fiat. These actions are performed in such a way as to be above the very controlling document that prevents such. Once this is allowed, precedence is set and such skirting actions become the norm, rights are lost forever. In this way we lose the primary purpose of the Constitution: to control the Federal Government and protect the People from that out-of-control Federal Government. Now enters the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution (more on this later).
Our best hope has been the Supreme Court; however if the far-left gets their way, our Country is lost. They want to 'pack the court' with additional judges to upset the balance and tip the scales in their favor (in the name of social justice, not the Constitution). They want to appoint additional progressive justices that will 'legislate from the bench', again under the guise of 'what's good for the people' and not what is constitutional law. They want manipulation not interpretation; liberalism not conservatism; and socialism not capitalism.
But for now, there is hope. In a 2017 unanimous decision, the US Supreme Court ruled:
"Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express 'the thought that we hate'". United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U. S. 644, 655 (1929) (Holmes, J., dissenting).
Additionally, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote:
"A law that can be directed against speech found offensive to some portion of the public can be turned against minority and dissenting views to the detriment of all. The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government's benevolence. Instead, our reliance must be on the substantial safeguards of free and open discussion in a democratic society."
A warning about how we might lose the right of free speech and the weaponizing of the federal government in respect to it.
Contrary to the belief of many, there are no so-called 'hate speech' laws in the United States and should never be in any truly free nation; there are 'hate crimes' laws but not 'hate speech'. And yet, after all the affirmations by the highest court in the land, President Donald J. Trump has been silenced. Not because of any 'hate speech' on his part, but because the opposition party hates him and what he stands for: American freedom, America first. The irony of this is, those people are in violation of: 18 U.S. Code 241 - Conspiracy against rights -
"If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;" -
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both..."
Why does this not apply to the many conspiring entities that have sought to suppress the 1st Amendment Rights of an American Citizen, not to mention a President before, during, and after his term of office?
So, we have clear 1st Amendment and 4th Amendment violations:
1st Amendment - "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances"; and
4th Amendment - "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
We are losing these rights, not by new amendments, but by unconstitutional legislation and executive orders! Both actions are clearly unconstitutional and an affront to our Democratic Republic! The 1st Amendment was clearly circumvented by legislation beginning circa 1996 under 47 U.S. Code 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material, section 'C', article 2. Also, the Patriot Act of 2001 was clearly unconstitutional, violating the 4th Amendment and was thoroughly abused by the Obama Administration, particularly in 2016 during the Trump campaign, but continuing until President-elect Trump took the oath of office in 2017. That illegal activity was continued covertly by embedded 'never Trumpers' throughout President Trump's term.
So, let's look at what our Founding Fathers and other historic Patriots had to say and compare those quotes to what is happening in the United States Republic today. The word 'socialism' was not coined at the time, so it does not appear in their words; however, it is very clear what they are warning us against:
-
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1755
A warning against socialism.
-
"Of the liberty of conscience in matters of religious faith, of speech and of the press; of the trial by jury of the vicinage in civil and criminal cases; of the benefit of the writ of habeas corpus; of the right to keep and bear arms...If these rights are well defined, and secured against encroachment, it is impossible that government should ever degenerate into tyranny." - James Monroe, circa 1774
A warning against a tyrannical government.
-
"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" - Patrick Henry, 1775
Another warning against a tyrannical government.
-
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams, 1776
Another warning against socialism.
-
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson, 1776
Another warning against a tyrannical government.
-
"Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia and Africa have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger, and England hath given her warning to depart. O! Receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind." - Thomas Paine 1776
Another warning against socialism.
-
"You will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make a good use of it" - John Adams, 1777
This is about the human cost of freedom; freedom is not free and should not be taken for granted.
-
"To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes [contributions], the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson, 1786
Another warning against socialism.
-
"When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe." - Thomas Jefferson 1787
Another warning against socialism.
-
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." - Thomas Jefferson, 1787
An appeal to countrymen, warning against a tyrannical government and the costs to prevent such.
-
After the Constitutional Convention in 1787, when someone shouted out, "Doctor, what have we got? A republic or a monarchy?" To which Benjamin Franklin responded: "A republic, if you can keep it."
Another warning that we have a nation of laws, a democratic republic, not a democracy where mobs rule (aka mobocracy) such as ANTIFA and BLM.
-
"As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms." - Tench Coxe, 1788
Another warning against a tyrannical government and the reason why we have the right to keep and bear arms.
-
"Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace." - James Madison, 1788
Another warning against a tyrannical government, in this case using a standing army against its own citizens, controlling the voice of the people by silencing a free press, and most important, the reason why we have the right to keep and bear arms.
-
"It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes, that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what it will be tomorrow." - James Madison, 1788
A warning against government corruption. This especially applies to laws enacted such as with the Affordable Care Act (aka ObamaCare). Remember the infamous words: "We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it." - House Minority Leader, Nancy Pelosi, 2010. This gave rise to the question: "Does your anus ever get jealous of the excrement that flows from your mouth? - author unknown
-
"Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light." - George Washington, 1794
-
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams, 1798
-
"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people, under the pretense of taking care of them." Also quoted as "if we can but prevent the government from wasting the labours of the people, under the pretence of taking care of them, they must become happy." - Thomas Jefferson 1802
Another warning against socialism.
-
"To take from one, because it is thought that his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, - the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry, and the fruits acquired by it." - Antoine Louis Claude Destutt de Tracy's Treatise on Political Economy, circa 1816. This has been interpreted to mean: "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - and attributed to Thomas Jefferson; the result is the same no matter who originally penned the quote circa 1816.
This is a very ominous direct warning against socialism as we know it now!
-
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual." - Thomas Jefferson, 1819
Another warning against a tyrannical government.
-
"It is incumbent on every generation to pay its' own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on, would save one-half the wars of the world." - Thomas Jefferson 1820
-
"The advancement and diffusion of knowledge is the only guardian of true liberty." - James Madison, 1825
-
But all was not lost for the leftists, for Benjamin Franklin did have one quote which has become the credo for their corrupt acts: "To succeed, jump as quickly at opportunities as you do at conclusions."
"Here, in the United States, we are alarmed by new calls to adopt socialism in our country. America was founded on liberty and independence - not government coercion, domination, and control. We are born free, and we will stay free." - President Donald J. Trump, 2019
|
